Two and a half months later... a changing picture

So does this mean I am back to square one? Hmmm...

As far as I am aware, everyone is doing great on the Beck Protocol. So, this is the great news.

The new piece of the puzzle that I don't quite know where to place yet is, that one of my friends who has been diagnosed as HIV+ in February, after a bout with Dengue, has seen the recent test results of the only person he considers it a possibility to have become infected by in the middle of last year... and the result is negative.

Though my friend does not want to take any chances, and continue the Beck Protocol in an intensive manner until the end of August (to be sure), it opens the question in my mind whether he is really HIV+ or whether the Dengue infection produced a false positive on the test. Which in turn re-opens Duesberg's hypothesis as a renewed possibility.

So I am back to rethinking everything from the start, from the limited knowledge I have... AIDS with it's beginnings in the drug centers of New York and San Francisco. The alleged discovery of a virus which was apparently never isolated, and linked to AIDS without any substantive proof at all. A flawed test with potentially a significantly understated percentage of false positives. HIV infection statistics with potentially super-inflated estimate numbers in order to boost funding.

The problem I have with all these things thrown into the mix is... as soon as people get 'diagnosed' as HIV+, whether this is real or imagined, they are placed on a regimen of drugs which are extremely strong, attack the blood, attack the bone marrow, attack the organs... the very things needed by the body to maintain a strong immune system.

If the drugs do the same thing the alleged virus does, in people who are not (illegal) drug users, or who use immuno-suppressive substances like "poppers", then how can we be sure that the breakdown of the immune system is attributable to a virus, and not simply the effect of destructive drugs?

How can the medical society claim to put the brakes on a virus, when people are really put on accelerators?

As Peter Duesberg entitled one of his chapters in his book "Inventing the AIDS virus", which I am reading right now... "With Therapies like these, who needs Disease?"

Keeping my mind open and continuing to work on the puzzle with the available pieces. Until next time.